Veteran-owned software consulting for AFLCMC, AFRL, and the Wright-Patt mission

Yes. VooStack is SBA-certified SDVOSB, which makes us eligible for sole-source awards up to the SDVOSB threshold and set-aside competition under FAR 19.14. We can prime on most AFLCMC and AFRL vehicles within that scope, and we routinely subcontract or team with larger primes on bigger programs. We carry a SAM registration, CAGE code, and DUNS/UEI, and we can stand up a teaming agreement quickly when a program office needs an SDVOSB partner to meet socioeconomic goals.

Our delivery engineers hold Secret as a baseline, with TS/SCI available on a portion of the team. We can support work at the 711th Human Performance Wing, AFRL directorates, and AFLCMC program offices that require cleared personnel on-site at Wright-Patt or at the National Air and Space Intelligence Center. For unclassified mission and business systems, we staff with cleared engineers anyway — it shortens the ramp on facility access and CAC issuance.

It's the unglamorous backbone — tools that track ECPs, manage tech orders, schedule depot inductions, forecast spares, and reconcile financials against contract line items. Most of it lives in aging stacks: Oracle Forms, mainframe green-screens fronted by Java, SharePoint workflows, and Access databases that someone's GS-13 wrote in 2009. Modernization means replacing the workflow without breaking the audit trail or the existing PEO reporting chain, which is harder than a greenfield build.

We deploy LLMs inside a government tenant — Azure Government with GPT, AWS GovCloud with Bedrock and Claude, or an on-prem inference stack for IL5 and above. Data never leaves the boundary. We scope AI to retrieval-augmented generation against approved corpora like tech orders, lessons-learned databases, or RFP libraries, and we log every prompt and completion for audit. We don't put generative models in the airworthiness or acquisition decision loop.

Yes. AFRL directorates generate enormous amounts of sensor, simulation, and experiment data, and the tooling around it is frequently a researcher's Python script glued to a shared drive. We build durable data pipelines — typically Python or Go services, Postgres or Parquet on object storage, and notebook environments that don't lose state when someone reboots. Reproducibility and metadata capture matter more than dashboard polish for research workflows.

On an existing vehicle where we're already an awardee or subcontractor, kickoff in two to three weeks once the task order drops. On a new prime award, figure four to six weeks for CAC, facility access, and any tenant provisioning on Cloud One or Platform One. We don't pad mobilization with billable ramp time — the first two weeks are typically discovery and ATO artifact review, not staffing theater.

We have engineers in the Dayton metro and across the Midwest who can be on-site at Wright-Patt regularly. For programs that need daily on-base presence, we staff local. For programs that are mostly NIPR/SIPR remote with periodic on-site reviews, we mix local and remote based on what the program office actually needs. We're not running a billable travel scheme — on-site time is driven by mission, not margin.

Typical engagements run from a six-figure modernization sprint — replacing one ugly legacy tool over three to four months — up to multi-year sustainment software efforts in the low millions. We're deliberately not a body shop. If a program needs 80 generalist contractors, we're the wrong call. If it needs a tight team of senior engineers who can ship cleared software and hand it back to the government, that's our lane.

Yes. We sub to larger primes on AFLCMC and AFRL programs where they need senior cleared engineers, an SDVOSB teammate to meet small-business goals, or specific skills like cloud migration, Kubernetes, or LLM integration. We bring named engineers with real resumes, not a bench of recruiter-sourced placeholders. Rate cards are transparent and we don't markup junior staff as senior.